![]() I am sure there are quite a few professionals for whom Lispworks has great value and the license costs are just a non-issue. And that is where the critique of the licensing scheme comes from. ![]() I would have loved to give it a try, but unfortunately I was never able to do do so. From what I can see it comes with a nice IDE and some nice libraries. I am convinced that Lispworks is a great product. you can also make small standalone apps with SBCL by building from source and setting a flag to allow compressed heap files. I also love open source Common Lisp and Scheme implementations.Īnyway, I would respectfully suggest to the author to maybe tone down the rhetoric a bit since different individual developers and companies have different requirements. Many years ago, I worked as a consultant on a medical AI project and my customer paid a fair amount of money to Franz for software licensing and tech support that included helping with development. Coincidentally, I am an advisor and chief architect for a small AI company and they use LispWorks also. I also paid the maintenance fee last year for continued updates. Small standalone executables with a tree shaker and I has received very good support without paying for the high priority support service. ![]() I had a business idea requiring Common Lisp a few years ago and I purchased a LispWorks Professional license. I always like seeing Common Lisp links, but personally I was a bit put off by the very strong anti-commercial comments about LispWorks and Franz.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |